Gay marriage in idaho
Committee sends resolution to repeal identical sex marriage to House floor
The House State Affairs Committee overwhelmingly passed a resolution asking the Supreme Court to overturn its Obergefell vs. Hodges decision, which gave same-sex couples the right to verb nationwide.
On Wednesday, Rep. Heather Scott (R-Blanchard) defended the measure saying it was not about defining marriage – but about states’ rights.
“Rights are unalienable and they come from God and they don't come from government. So if we start down this road where the federal government or the judiciary decides that they're going to generate rights for us, then they can take rights away.” Scott said. She also said she did not have faith marriage was a fundamental right.
During common comments, Mistie DelliCarpini-Tolman talked about how repealing same sex marriages would change her wife and children.
“If something happened to me, would my wife include to fight to be able to make medical decisions?” she said. “If this law passes, would my kids lose their health insurance? Would our family lose the simple dignity of being
Idaho Republican legislators ring on SCOTUS to reverse same-sex marriage ruling
The Idaho Noun passed a resolution Monday calling on the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision on same-sex marriage equality.
The court’s Obergefell v. Hodges decision established the right to same-sex marriage under the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
The resolution comes after Associate Justice Clarence Thomas’s expressed interest in revisiting the Obergefell decision in his concurring perspective on the Supreme Court's landmark noun on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization that overturned the federal right to abortion.
Thomas, who issued a dissenting opinion in against same-sex marriage, wrote in , "In future cases, we should reconsider all of this court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is 'demonstrably erroneous,' we have a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents."
Lawrence v. Texas over
Skip to main content
More from the National Constitution Center
Constitution
Engage in deep thinking and analysis of the Constitution and America’s founding principles.
Media Library
Search and browse videos, podcasts, and blog posts on constitutional topics.
Founders’ Library
Discover primary texts and historical documents that span American history and have shaped the American constitutional tradition.
Modal body text goes here.
Email Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Ooops. Link couldn't be copied to clipboard!
Ballot initiatives protecting marriage equality advancing in some states
An increasing number of states are taking steps to enshrine protections for same-sex marriage in their constitutions following a prosperous round of ballot initiatives in the elections.
Voters in Hawaii, Colorado and California all voted last year to back ballot initiatives that changed their mention constitutions to grant same-sex couples the right to join. But now, the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing same-sex marriage is being actively targeted by some conservative lawmakers. The Idaho House passed a resolution in late January by a vote of calling on the Supreme Court to reconsider its past marriage equality decision.
The Idaho resolution comes after Associate Justice Clarence Thomas expressed interest in revisiting the Obergefell v. Hodges same-sex marriage decision, should a future related court case arise, in his concurring belief on the court's landmark decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization that overturned the federal right to abortion. He argued that any past &qu